![]() 08/29/2013 at 19:50 • Filed to: Subaru | ![]() | ![]() |
More Here: !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!!
![]() 08/29/2013 at 19:54 |
|
DO WANT!
![]() 08/29/2013 at 19:56 |
|
Stay completely still. I don't think it can see us unless we move. Now...calmly... RUN.
![]() 08/29/2013 at 19:58 |
|
Yup. The bugeye is still my favorite 'rex.
![]() 08/29/2013 at 19:59 |
|
It's cool in a different sort of way, but that is a seriously complicated system for no real benefit other than being different.
Have to give the props for doing it his way and making it work.
![]() 08/29/2013 at 20:11 |
|
It looks like it has buckteeth. DO NOT WANT!
![]() 08/29/2013 at 20:11 |
|
Six eyes and two sideways mouths...what kind of Lovecraftian horror is this?
![]() 08/29/2013 at 20:11 |
|
This would sum up what I think of this as well.
Also: the ever-important issue of weight distribution!
![]() 08/29/2013 at 20:14 |
|
Well it does make 460whp on 93 and 612 on 110. So there's that
![]() 08/29/2013 at 20:14 |
|
Yeah I'm not a fan of the look of the dual FMIC
![]() 08/29/2013 at 20:56 |
|
Yeah, but a sleeved 2.5 could do that single twin scroll EFR or done a proper sequential turbo system staggering something like a GT2971R into a larger 35+. The argument can't even be made that this was done for response simply because of the piping. It splits to two turbos that then feed a single intake.
The point is that it is interesting, but it's more of an oddity than anything.
![]() 08/29/2013 at 20:57 |
|
Seriously. That is a lot of weight moved into odd places for no reason, but to each their own I guess.
![]() 08/29/2013 at 21:00 |
|
Gotcha. It would be awesome to see that sequential setup.
![]() 08/29/2013 at 21:06 |
|
Best not to get into any serious fender bender....
![]() 08/29/2013 at 23:03 |
|
what we are looking at here is a very expensive future fender bender.
![]() 08/30/2013 at 00:05 |
|
3MPH hedge crash?